Search results

Yes, I understand that in theory this is how it should work. In practice, for the example in my previous post the value is always 0, no matter time: before or after 20; before or after 6 RAM1B7 is always 0 and RAM1B8 is always 0 Strange If I change the logic to the following: TSTLE CH 20 RAM1B7...

Hello there, Let me revive the old topic since I stumbled with the same problem of not working CH on my WC8 firmware 3.3.19 (released in 2015) Based on user manual of this firmware and examples there, the following should work: TSTLE CH 6 RAM1B7 NOP TSTGE CH 20 RAM1B8 NOP ORB RAM1B7 RAM1B8...

I also used this sensor but I never relied on the documentation; I just used multimeter to check where +5V and where ground and connected accordingly based on the sensor's datasheet. So if you connect it based on where real 5V and ground is and if +5V is stable (no issues with internal 5V...

Support, your last message is not related to the problem I described here, at the very beginning and so on. It has nothing to do with inputs IPx.   I had no issues with IPx and I had no issues with the logic and the PLC functioning- it worked properly all the time, even with PLC program based on...

OK, so I changed PLC program 4 weeks ago and it works no issues since then. The previous program used CTS for time markers (see the previous post). There was no any network traffic but it appears this PLC program caused this phenomenon where the board stopped responding via web- it looks like...

I use similar to this in 3 places in the code, so 3 RAM locations are constantly updated with 32 bit number; maybe it is too much for the CPU and it stops responding to network traffic after some time?   TSTEQ RAM11 1   ADD CTS UROM2 RAM7 TSTGE CTS RAM7  GOTO OFF2  GOTO ON2   The logic: When...

It worked 2 days; this morning it is not accessible again. I will be there in January; only then I  could do something. At least PLC is running and it does its job as for now.

In my PLC program there are few places where I check if inputs are zero. For example, I use TSTEQ IP1 0 VAR1 Maybe it is better to use TSTNE IP1 1 VAR1 instead? Logically it is the same but maybe there is some caveat here?

Sure I tested from outside while I was there, every day few time per day. I wanted to make sure all works properly before I fly. I checked on the way to airport- it worked fine; the next day I checked- gone; I could not connect to it anymore :-( I asked someone go there to turn it off and on...

Yes, other place with WC8 use the same Deco M5 router and it works no issues. This router is connected to two WC8; only one has this problem. Again- it worked properly for more than a week; stopped working exactly once no one was in the condo for long time, thus I suspected something in the code...

I have just rebooted the router- did not help... It works with another WC8 but does not work with this one... So the problem is 100% in the WC8. It sends email but does not allow access to its GUI. It's IP address and port did not change since I left the condo- and it worked... The only thing...

Hi Suport, thanks for reply.   I can see on router app (Deco M5 smartphone app) that there is no traffic coming to the controller- it is 0k al the time, unless I try to communicate with it- then I see it receives 1-2 k but does not respond. The PLC code is not sending emails all the time- it...

The WC8 controls A/C based on occupancy. I did port forwarding in TP-Link Deco M5 router. It worked fine for about a week during which I was in the condo- remote access worked fine too. Once I left the condo (I don't live there), the next day the controller became not accessible remotely via...

For WC8, I noticed that temp sensor DS18B20 is sensitive to 5V voltage level. It will not work and will show "faulty" if the voltage is just above 5.00V, Say, it will not work if it will be 5.02V If the voltage is 4.95V, and below (down to 4V)  it works stable, no problems. So I guess if there...

Yes, and the way I fixed that just confirms that the current firmware has a bug when 2 emails should be sent at the same time- just as I explained many times, from the beginning. What I did is just workaround: I just make sure emails do not sent at the same time. 10 seconds delay makes this...

Wow, this is so funny :-) I have never seen that customer who has experience with this stuff for few weeks only, knows the stuff better than people who suppose to support the product :)   Support, do you understand English at least ? I already do not expect you to understand your own opcodes :)...

Well, I use only 4 digital inputs, one digital output, one  temp sensor  and humidity sensor, that's it. So I do not believe I abuse the board's resources a lot :-) And my code is not large, 81 lines only. The code runs sequentially to check all inputs, send emails if conditions met and turn...

Larry,   The thing is that my interpretation confirmed by practice (the work of a real board). This is how it works in reality: the test will return false all the time unless the value of VAR6 is 0 for 43200 seconds or more. It does NOT follow the change of VAR6 from 0 to 1 and so on. And this...

Support,    I do not just say that you have a bug. I proved that you have a bug. See my previous message. It clearly shows that the problem is nothing to do with VAR6 flipping- the problem appears at the very first VAR6 getting 1.   When I disable IP3 (disable triggering of EM3), I get correct...

Great so may be this is the indication that you have a bug in the firmware. Because there is nothing in the code that would call for EM3 from the portion of the code that involves motion detector. These are completely different parts of the code: Motion detector controls heater ON/OF function...