OK, that explains it. If the tstats report in increments of .5 C that is almost 1 F at 60-70 degrees which is what I am seeing. When the temperatures that I am analyzing have ranges of, say, 5 F, then it is almost impossible to see trends caused by solar, office equipment, door openings, adjoining rooms, outdoor temp, etc., when I can only observe 1 F increments. When you look at a tstat to see what the temp is, 1 F increments are fine. But to programatically look at the cause and effect relationships of the local environment to the heating system, 1 F steps are too course. But now that I know what I can get, I can deal with it. Thanks for the information.
I question the tstat designers' decision to use a temperature range of -40 F to 189 F for an indoor temperature device. They could have chosen a much more realistic range and doubled the reporting accuracy. They also could have offered a setup option that would have provided two ranges, one with the extreme temperatures for those of us who leave our windows open in the antarctic, and one with reasonable temperatures. A range of 0-50 C (32 - 122 F) would almost triple the accuracy of the output.