I have an Omnipro II with motion sensors, door sensors and with Simply-Automated UPB lights. My contractor configured the lights with UPStart and then put names into PCAccess for each of the units. HAI units 1-55 now correspond to UPB devices 1-55 in UPStart. I have programmed many links into UPStart. I have noticed that when I activate a link via a UPB switch, the HAI Status for the associated Units does not accurately reflect the status of the device. For example, UPB devices 1 & 2 are both set to activate upon receipt of Link 5. When I push the button to activate Link 5, the lights go on, but the HAI shows the status of the devices as Off. I can also activate Units 1 & 2 from the HAI. When I do this, the lights go on and the HAI now shows the status as On.
Why doesn’t the HAI correctly reflect the status of a UPB device when it is activated by a UPB link?
I have seen several posts about using HLC for non-HAI UPB lights. If I understand this right, I can configure the UPB devices as HLC devices and then the HAI will monitor their status. Is this correct? I prefer to have the UPB network activate and deactivate the links because it has a faster reaction time than going through the HAI controller. Will the HAI know or care if I don’t adhere to the HLC Unit numbering room-by-room? Will I have problems with devices 1, 9, 17, etc. which are supposed to be HLC Room Controllers?
As it turns out, I have 21 Rooms configured in UPStart, none of which have more than 7 devices. My OmniPro II can support up to 31 rooms, so I should have the capacity to reconfigure my UPB devices to conform to the HLC convention. For example, the 7 kitchen lights would be HLC Units 2-8, and the 4 living room lights would be HLC Units 10-13 (saving devices 1 and 9 for the non-existent Room Controllers). Would I do this configuration via UPStart and then just name the Units in PCAccess or should I do the configuration using PCAccess and then let UPStart discover the network?
HLC seems to be limited to just 6 scenes per room. Many of my UPB links affect lights in different rooms. If I create UPB links in UPStart, will the HAI correctly see the status of the devices?
Why doesn’t the HAI correctly reflect the status of a UPB device when it is activated by a UPB link?
I have seen several posts about using HLC for non-HAI UPB lights. If I understand this right, I can configure the UPB devices as HLC devices and then the HAI will monitor their status. Is this correct? I prefer to have the UPB network activate and deactivate the links because it has a faster reaction time than going through the HAI controller. Will the HAI know or care if I don’t adhere to the HLC Unit numbering room-by-room? Will I have problems with devices 1, 9, 17, etc. which are supposed to be HLC Room Controllers?
As it turns out, I have 21 Rooms configured in UPStart, none of which have more than 7 devices. My OmniPro II can support up to 31 rooms, so I should have the capacity to reconfigure my UPB devices to conform to the HLC convention. For example, the 7 kitchen lights would be HLC Units 2-8, and the 4 living room lights would be HLC Units 10-13 (saving devices 1 and 9 for the non-existent Room Controllers). Would I do this configuration via UPStart and then just name the Units in PCAccess or should I do the configuration using PCAccess and then let UPStart discover the network?
HLC seems to be limited to just 6 scenes per room. Many of my UPB links affect lights in different rooms. If I create UPB links in UPStart, will the HAI correctly see the status of the devices?